May 21, 2012

Pegasus II  coming in 2014
Shadows coming in 2013

Whinge snarl cavil

 

I have just been trying to book next season’s tickets to Live from the Met(ropolitan Opera) and . . . ARRRRRGH.  Glasnost and jelly donuts THERE ARE A LOT OF FRELLING AWFUL WEB SITES IN THE WORLD.  The heavy hand of my suspicion falls on the shoulder of the Met Opera itself in this case, although the home site of the national Rapscallion Cinema chain is not my favourite battleground either arrrrrrrrgh.  But in the first place you have to book every individual opera separately.  This is such a confounded nuisance it literally loses them some of my custom—if I’m wavering about whether I want to see The Pirate, the Anglerfish and the Epipelagic Zone* I’ll decide against it just so I don’t have to groan through their horrible purchasing system again.  This includes timing you out if you take too long.  They timed me out three times tonight.  Once it was because their site had hung.**  The other two times I wasn’t anywhere near the end of their so-called time limit, they just threw me out for laughs.  And then I had to START ALL OVER AGAIN.  Now, I am a member of the sodding Rapscallion community, for the single purpose of being able to book Live at the Met a week or something early before rank and file are allowed in***—which system is at least finally working.†  When I log on it greets me by name, and is happy to present me with my back catalogue of many, many Met Live tickets.   But the moment I try to book another one . . . they want my name, several times, my email address, several times†† . . . you’ve got something like ten screens to get through FOR EVERY GODSFRELLING SODBLASTED TICKET, including things like ‘choose credit/debit card’ and you click the drop down AND THERE IS EXACTLY ONE CHOICE:  CREDIT/DEBIT CARD.  But if you don’t tick it, the page wipes itself and tells you you need to choose a credit/debt card.  There are also at least two screens that merely say ‘confirm’.  One of them is the one that crashed me.  One of them is also the screen that prevented me from booking Francesca di Rimini at all.  It hung for a while and then said Oops!  There’s a problem!, and crashed me back to the beginning.  I tried three times and gave up.  I don’t know whether I want to see Francesca di Rimini anyway.†††

            The day did not get off to a good start when we had a frelling tourist invasion.‡  Go.  Away.   I feel you notice the ‘not our town, we don’t give a rat’s ass’ much more strongly in a village than you do in a city—I remember this from Maine.  In New York City it’s the tourists who are at risk.‡‡  Today’s high points were (a) when hellhounds and I were rolling along the wide green way to the mews and found an SUV the size of at least one House of Parliament rolling down the PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT straight at us.  He wanted to park on the grass so he didn’t have to pay the fee in one of the car parks.  Like it costs a lot in a town the size of New Arcadia, you know?  But most of the green way is blocked off from the road by trees.  If you want to be the world’s biggest asshole, you have to drive on the pedestrian pavement.  ARRRRRRRRGH.  And (b) when both hellhounds picked up chicken bones.  I want to kill people who throw their trash around anyway, and I really want to kill people who throw food trash around . . . but I suppose it’s just conceivable that some of our overweight not-at-all-wild‡‡‡ ducks might eat sandwich-ends before the rats got there, but CHICKEN BONES?  People who throw chicken bones on the street should be buried standing up under the cornerstones of important civic buildings, and thus be of some use to society at last.

            Okay.  I’m not in a good mood.

            But, speaking of wildlife—and of tantrums—cross-species adolescence, I love it.  After various responsibilities and crises had been dispatched I said THE HELL WITH IT and rushed out into the garden, where I dug and toiled and planted for . . . longer than I should have, but I came indoors much more cheerful.§  My adolescent robin was perched in the apple tree right outside the greenhouse—the greenhouse where the saucer of mealworms lives§§ having a complete paddy that dad wasn’t dedicated to bringing him mealworms.  Hey, you big fat turkeybutt, go get your own mealworms.§§§ 

* * *

* They all die in the end.  Including the entire crew of the bathysphere.  But the soprano goes out on some amazing top notes from the helium.  

** You’re sitting there, knitting furiously^, and glancing periodically at the large banner heading that says ‘do not hit refresh or not only will this transaction crash and burn but we will refuse to let you back on our delicate, easily disturbed site forever and your kitchen will blow up’.  So you don’t and . . . tick tick tick . . . eventually you time out, and then you get a snooty message telling you that if you’re going to frell about you deserve what you get.  ARRRRRRRGH

^ Got a couple more inches done yesterday, thanks to a forty-five minutes late bride.  Who as a result got about seven minutes of ringing because most of the band had to go on to another wedding.  Why it’s not in the contract that you’re hiring your ringers for exactly one hour from the time your wedding is scheduled to be over . . . I have no idea.  Us hoi polloi keep suggesting this and the higher-ups keep muttering inaudibly and not doing anything. 

*** After three years I have my seat.  If My Seat is ever already taken I may have palpitations.  I even found myself, this time, thinking, as I viewed with deepest gloom the six hours of Parsifal, that I wouldn’t book now, I’d wait till nearer time and if My Seat wasn’t taken . . . ^ 

^ This won’t actually help me much.  It won’t be taken.  The long Wagners are only attended by the faithful, which doesn’t often include me.  There are many valid excuses for staying at home and doing your knitting from the comfort of your own sofa.  I have ME.  ‘I can’t stand that misogynistic Aryan bully, I don’t care if he knew a few chords’ is also valid.  One of the things I have against Shakespeare is he goes on so.  Wagner??   Dear merciful gods.  

† First year I tried it, they took my membership money . . . and then declared ‘special events’, as for example the Met Live broadcasts, were not included.  GAAAAAAAARGH. 

†† They will also throw me out randomly for having ‘non matching email ID’.  The first time, maybe.  Typos are always a possibility.  The second, third and fourth times, no.  I guarantee my email address was accurate.  But the gremlins were clearly getting bored. 

††† And I decided I really can’t face Rigoletto in 1960s Las Vegas.  Gods, demons and bell-bottoms.  Why are directors allowed to pull idiot feckless crap like this?  WHY?^  Stick to Broadway, honeybun.  They love you there.  

^ If every critic in the solar system gives it five stars, I’ll reconsider.+  

+ But My Seat will have been taken, for a five-star Rigoletto. 

‡ Trippers who stroll up my cul de sac because it’s quaint and part of their Sunday afternoon expedition should have boiling oil or at least hot borscht poured on them from an upper storey windows.  I keep thinking about it.  You know how beetroot stains—?  So, you want a memento of New Arcadia?  It can be arranged. 

‡‡ ‘Hey, wanna buy a nice bridge?’ 

‡‡‡ And Darkness is going to nail one, one day.  I’m just hoping he doesn’t take both himself and me into the river in the process.  There would be language.  

§ Until I decided to tackle the Met Live. 

§§ I wouldn’t dare show my face in the garden if I didn’t top up the saucer both when I come out and when I finally go in again.  In between I may be sworn at, but there are some limits. 

§§§ Although speaking of the robin’s unbridled passion for mealworms:  while I was inconveniently using the potting table in the greenhouse, I’d put the saucer farther in, on a shelf near the other door.  Dad robin was not best pleased with this arrangement, and kept whirring in and out trying to dodge around me (and the paddying offspring in the apple tree.  Dratblast it, where is the new nest?).  I’d come back to the greenhouse when, apparently, he wasn’t looking, and was bending over to fetch a trowel off the ground as he came fizzing back in again—more or less as I was starting to straighten up.  Both of us were dismayed—and neither of us stopped fast enough, and I briefly had a robin on the back of my neck.  He trampolined off again . . .

Writery things

 

 

In the first place:  

http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s320x320/423615_272724886138698_100002035654088_610973_443590055_n.jpg

 Hee hee hee hee hee hee hee.  (Peter’s publishing daughter sent me this.) 

Okay.  That was your light relief. 

Now, in the second place, a lot of you will have seen this already, including anyone who follows me on Twitter: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/13/business/in-e-reader-age-of-writers-cramp-a-book-a-year-is-slacking.html?_r=1

The headline reads:  In E-Reader Age of Writer’s Cramp*, a Book a Year is Slacking.  And any sane author’s reaction is:  Killlllllllllllllllllll Meeeeeeeeeee.  (Maureen Johnson’s retweet says:  Here’s an article in the [New York Times] about how everyone is trying to kill authors.)    

            Well.  Yes.  I would love to attain a novel a year.  Or a novel most years.  Or a novel every eighteen months.  Or something.  And there are writers—a few—who can write two novels a year at least occasionally** and still stab you in the heart with their amazingness.  Or if you’re producing stories that genuinely aren’t supposed to do anything but while away an hour or two—I hope I’m not getting myself into too much trouble here, but I do think there’s a place for stories that are only trying to divert:  and, if I’m not getting myself into too much more trouble, I might suggest Agatha Christie as the sort of thing:  I don’t think anyone goes to Agatha Christie for empathy or catharsis, do they?—then maybe, that’s maybe, you can write more than one book a year and keep your quality (and your pride in your work) up.*** 

            But for the rest of us . . . for those of us who essay the occasional well-rounded character, who wish to evoke rather than report, who hope for readers who don’t quite shake the dust of our stories off their page-turning fingers at the end . . . I’m a slow writer.  I know I’m slow.  But I flatly don’t believe any mere human can produce two good books every year and go on doing it.†

            I had a lot of lovely tweets from people†† saying they’d rather wait for books that have been written rather than not wait for those that have been churned out to an anti-human schedule.  And I don’t really have a choice:  this is how I am.  This is how I write.  If this doesn’t work, I am going to have to run away to the circus.†††  I tell myself that the world has always claimed to be on the brink of final breakdown of one sort or another—I imagine this dates back to gossip around the fire just after that seditious object the wheel had been invented.  But I admit that the particular part of my world that is disintegrating as a result of what is in many ways a great invention, the internet, worries me . . . more than a little.

            To end this post on writery things, I give you, in the third place:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/13/books/review/the-writer-in-the-family.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

I don’t, in fact, agree with a lot of it, but then I’ve also never been a member of the standard family, with growing-up children I’m somehow part responsible for and all that, so my view is skewed.  But I love the exchange:  ‘Would I have read anything you’ve written?’ from some clueless dweeb you’ve just been introduced to, and Rosenblatt’s reply, ‘How should I know?’  I’m going to remember that one.‡

            But the paragraph that had me in hysterics is the one about E L Doctorow trying to write an excuse slip for his daughter, who had missed school the day before.  YEEEEEEEEEEEES.  This is exactly what happens when you pull your specialised, carefully conditioned, writery bits out of the rarefied atmosphere of fiction and try to make them produce a grocery list or a thank-you note or an email to the department store that sent you a toaster instead of an electric blanket.  Yesssss.

            Hee hee hee hee hee hee.  Which is a much better place to both come in and go out. 

* * *

* Which should be recategorised anyway as writer’s repetitive stress injury 

** Peter did this more than once 

*** Is this writing as craft rather than art?  Sometimes you don’t want to be engaged.  Sometimes you just want to sit quietly and drink your tea and read a rose catalogue.^  Sometimes you want your chair to have four legs and a seat and not be a dazzling heirloom for the ages when you stagger downstairs in the morning and reach for your electric kettle. 

^ Credit card engagement is a different issue. 

† Even Charles Dickens, for example^, took holidays, and the quality of his writing is drastically variable, from the mind-explodingly tremendous to the diabolically awful.  

^ I’m reading Claire Tomalin’s biography of him right now.  I knew he was—erm—a complex character and not all of it good, but the thing I probably find the most fascinating is how narrow the line is between socially aware and engaged literary genius with some personal issues and WHINING, SELF-ABSORBED COMPLETE TICK . . . who by the way wrote some fabulous stories and did some amazing things.  You may have guessed I incline to the latter opinion.  It’s all about him, all of the time.  And I don’t deal well with the sins of the extrovert. 

            Fascinating book however.  I recommend it.  And it’s not that Dickens didn’t have to cope with more than one human’s fair share of bulltiddly:  he did.  I’d have drowned his unspeakable father, for example, and I’d’ve had apoplexy if I’d been trying to earn a living as a writer back in the days before there was an international copyright law.  I am riveted by the standard accusations thrown at Dickens when he had the balls—and good for him—to stand up and say stealing people’s work is wrong.  He is being greedy, sneered the newspapers, and he should be grateful that people want to read his books.  Plus ça frelling frelling change.   And we’ve even got, or anyway had, international copyright law for quite a while—although the whole e thing is busy taking that to bits too. Greedy?  GratefulHow, pray tell, are us storytellers supposed to earn a living?  How do you think we frelling eat and pay the mortgage if we don’t sell our stories?   Leprechaun?  Printing press in the cellar for counterfeit money?  Wealthy indulgent lover?  What?  What?  I get really bored with people who think that all writers are wealthy, but at least these people are acknowledging that being a professional writer involves money.  The people who think that writers^ are supposed to give it away and be grateful if anyone wants it . . . should frelling try it some time.  Show me someone who is giving it away and doesn’t have either another, paying job, a trust fund, or a joint bank account with a Fortune 500 CEO, and I’ll show you a hologram, an alien from another dimension, or a homeless bag person who is about to die of starvation.

            Which is more or less where we came in . . . 

^ I assume that painters, sculptors, jewellery-makers, knitters and so on have the same problem.  Maybe it’s that we work in words that it seems to me we get so much (wordy) stick.   Maybe it’s just that I’m a writer, I notice writer-aimed stick more. 

†† Including a gratifying rant from our own Maren.  Thank you.  And a horrified fellow-feeling my-fingers-are-shrivelling from Jodi, who had already seen the article. 

††† And to you who tweeted me about this too:  hellhounds would love the circus, once they got a little used to the uproar.  And if New Thing’s heroine can haul a rose-bush around in a pot, why can’t I?  I can put it (or them) on the steps of my trailer every time we stop. 

            Peter, I admit, is a problem.  I don’t think he’d like the circus at all.  

‡ I can hear Merrilee clutching her forehead.

Happy happy happy. Happy. Happy. Grrrrrr.

 

IT’S THE FIRST DAY OF A THREE-DAY BANK HOLIDAY WEEKEND.  AND THE CROWN ON ONE OF MY HORRIBLE STUPID TEETH HAS JUST FALLEN OUT.  I’m so happy.  Happy, happy, happy, happy. 

            It has not been a brilliant day and furthermore Peter is in Cardamomlinghamshire visiting relatives so I don’t even have him around to blame.

            Gemma told me last night, cheerfully, on her way out the door after handbells** that she probably won’t be there for afternoon ringing at the abbey on Sunday.  She saw the stark panic flood my face and said hastily, you’ll be fine.  You’ll be fine.  I’ll be fine, eggs grow on trees, teabags make the best tea, and Charlemagne was a girl.  AAAAAAUGH.  Last Sunday it was five fabulous male ringers . . . and Gemma and me.  AAAAAAAAUGH.

            I’ll be fine.  Yes.  I’ll be fine.  I’ll take my knitting. . . .

            AND WE’RE GOING TO HAVE A FROST TOMORROW NIGHT.  A FROST!  A FRELLING, FRELLING, FRELLING, FRELLING FROST!  IT’S MAY!  IT’S MAY IN SOUTHERN ENGLANDWE’RE ALLOWED TO PLANT LITTLE TENDER GREEN THINGS OUTDOORS IN THE GROUND IN MAY IN SOUTHERN ENGLAND!***

            Usually.

            I had quite a nice time in the garden a couple of days ago—when it finally stopped raining long enough to make this practical—playing eenie meanie with all the racks and rows of little green mail-order things that arrived during the floods and are still waiting to be put somewhere they can settle down and grow.†  I planted the sweet peas, finally, some begonias, some (tender) fuchsias, most of the rest of the glads, some petunias.  Today . . . today I (furiously) planted the dahlia cuttings in pots two or three sizes smaller than I meant to—I don’t have TIME for endless potting-on:  stuff goes in an intermediate pot and then it goes into the ground or into its big permanent pot—so they’d all fit on a tray in case I’m bringing them indoors tomorrow night.  The stuff that is already in the ground is going to have to take its chances†† . . . but the sitting-room is going to be frelling impassable if I have to bring in all the unfrost-proof things in trays and pots or still in their mail-order plastic cells. . . .   

* * *

* You made my crown fall out!  You did!  You know you did! 

** Have I told you we seem to have morphed into Thursday and Friday handbells??  Wait, wait, I have a novel to finish and I do need to reserve some brain.  I think I’ve told you Gemma is a doctor, and she’s just changed clinics/surgeries which means her schedule has changed, and Thursday afternoon handbells are no longer possible.  So we had, I thought, moved handbells to Fridays right before New Arcadia bell practise^ . . . except that it turns out Colin can’t do Fridays but was too polite to say so.^^  I have this habit of not really paying attention to details and therefore found myself saying to Niall and Colin, well, okay, we’ll just have to keep on with Thursdays, and Niall and I can ring with Gemma on Fridays . . . WHAT AM I SAYING.  This week was the first of the new schedule and . . . two days in a row of handbells is . . . intense.  

^ Which means I will now stuff hellhounds into their harnesses and pelt out the door so as to be out of earshot by the time they start ringing up.  I’m getting better at sleeping through Sunday mornings though. 

^ The British.  ARRRRRRRGH. 

*** I’m having another of those ‘why do I DO this to myself??’ moments.  I moaned this to Peter tonight over the phone and he said, because you’d think less well of yourself if you didn’t^, which is true as far as it goes, but it still begs the question why do I have to choose activities where terror will be my natural environment?  Why couldn’t I collect stamps or go to more films?^^ 

^ And given my standard level of self-appreciation this could get dangerous.  

^^ No horror, of course.+ 

+ Avengers Assemble is playing semi-around here this weekend and I am half-tempted to go except for two things:  (a) it’s in frelling 3D, and my loathing for (frelling) 3D was renewed and reinforced by (multi-frelling) THOR and (b) I haven’t got time.  If I’m going to ring bells and sing and rescue all the little green things drowning in my garden(s) and finish a novel before the hellhounds and I have to stop eating, although the hellhounds wouldn’t mind, I haven’t got time.#  And, just by the way, Sunday morning ringing at New Arcadia is forty minutes plus a one-minute bolt from the cottage to the tower and a more leisurely several-minute stroll back.  Sunday afternoon ringing at the abbey is an hour, plus a half hour commute.  Also, terror is tiring.  

# And the blog is a not insignificant eater of time.~ 

~ And there are a lot of doodles waiting to be doodled.  Siiiigh.  I should draw you a Venn diagram of Available Energy Usage by Robin McKinley some time.  I don’t know if this is the frelling ME, or advancing age, or just that I’ve always been peculiar, but what I can and can’t do isn’t just about whether I feel (relatively) alert and intelligent or as if I have ham salad for brains and limbs made of half deflated inner tubes.  It’s more of a Chinese-menu situation where you want stuff from as many columns as possible.  And your fortune cookie is still going to tell you you’re frelled. 

*** Meanwhile friends in the Midwestern prairie are having temperatures pushing ninety (°F).  

† I’m still seeing disturbingly few little feathered things in the shrubbery.^  I wouldn’t have thought literal drowning was all that likely in my garden-on-a-hill, and there’s still the greenhouse to take shelter in.  Nor would I have thought I have many predators out there, although what is that unpleasing line about there always being a rat within five feet of you?  I’m sure my local rats would be more than happy to tuck into adolescent robin.  But dad robin is still hanging around for mealworms.  Robins are such fearless little critters^^ that you get a prime view of what’s going on with them.  There were still two adults^^^ when I started putting mealworms out but they were very chary of me—which served to reinforce my guilt about how little gardening I’ve been doing recently and it’s not all down to the weather—but robins don’t really do chary and dad, at this point, pretty well gets in my face and says, Mealworms?  Where are the mealworms?, if he’s dispatched the previous serving.  I put them out twice a day, and he must be feeding them to someone because if he ate all of them himself he’d explode.  The mealworm saucer normally lives on my potting table in the greenhouse but I put it out in the courtyard by the kitchen door when I want to use my table, on top of a tall pot that will have a dahlia in it eventually.  He knows this.  So first he sits in the apple tree next to the greenhouse and stares at me, and then he perches on that pot and looks at me meaningfully.  I may have to start buying more mealworms. 

^ I did get a couple of photos of the babies, but they’re not very good.  The nest is tucked back behind various jars and plastic boxes of plant food and it’s dark.  I didn’t want to blow a flash in their tiny fluffy faces and I haven’t been very lucky with the right angles of sunlight . . . or any angles of sunlight, lately.  They’re only in the nest about ten days, I think—maybe two weeks.  Not long at all.  And I didn’t notice they’d hatched immediately—they were already beginning to grow feathers by the time I saw them—since I’d been trying to leave mum alone so she’d go on sitting.  But I’m reasonably sure there were five of them to begin with.  Five’s a lot.  

^^ Unlike their human namesake  

^^^ If there’s only one parent left, it’s probably dad, because mum has sashayed off to start a new nest somewhere else. 

†† I may raise the odds a bit by throwing a bit of bubble wrap around.  After potting up the frelling sweet peas—usually I just slap them in the ground to begin with—and bringing them in and out for about a fortnight I am VERY RELUCTANT TO LOSE THEM NOW.

Three (or four) links

 

Read this:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/12/twitters-tales-of-sexism 

I’ve wasted some time trying to annotate it a bit from my own life.  Linda Grant is only a year older than I am;  the world she’s talking about is the world I grew up in too.  But this kind of thing is—still—one of my hot buttons, and I’m tired, having had my head down for a protracted period over SHADOWS* today, and not feeling 100% after the friendly weekend visit from the ME either.  So I keep getting to the gibbergibbergibber *&^%$£”!!!!!! point, hitting ‘delete’, and starting again.  I would do more political stuff in the blog if I didn’t have such a short fuse—but I arguably don’t have a fuse, I just go from jolly la-la-la to global meltdown in the wink of an eye.  And I don’t have the time or the strength to support that kind of blog.

            So, if you haven’t already read what Linda Grant says, read it now, and assume that I’ve got stories to go with most of these.  Arrrrrgh.

 * * *

And then, speaking of How the World Changes, Sometimes in Ways That Don’t Make You Entirely Happy even if You’ve Known It Was Coming: 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/mar/13/encyclopedia-britannica-halts-print-publication?newsfeed=true

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/after-244-years-encyclopaedia-britannica-stops-the-presses/ 

This has been all over the place—I had like six tweets with links to six different articles in the space of half an hour.  I’m interested that they’re saying that Wikipedia is generally considered reliable;  I use it, but if and when they have to start charging for it, I’ll stop using it, because their hands-off policy on editorial bias is not okay with me, on the subject, for example, of homeopathy, which article is pretty blatant about saying it’s bulltwaddle.  It isn’t.  But any alteration toward the positive is smacked down at once.**

            But I grew up worshipping the Britannica and—I’ve told you this story—with my tiny advance for BEAUTY, my very first published novel, I bought . . . two bookcases and a Britannica.***  And I’ve been buying the yearbooks ever since.  That’s a lot of yearbooks.  Peter will be delighted if these stop, which I assume they will too.  But . . . the passing of an era, oh. . . .  I am less nostalgic for the paper encyclopaedia than I might be because the instant-update online thing is completely persuasive.  But the fact that this is the way world now is—pretty well incredibly different than thirty-four years ago when I bought my Britannica—is a little vertiginous.   And I still want a copy of the—eleventh edition, is it?—for what I suppose amounts to nostalgia.  But I have an old two-fat-volume eighteen-sixty-something Pears Cyclopedia which I love to bits†.  You’re not going to get the same picture of the contemporary world thirty-four years from now from a daily updated on line encyclopaedia, even if it keeps chronological records—although perhaps the world will have changed incredibly again by then.††  

 * * *

Third link, and returning at last to the frivolous, where I am (perhaps) less likely to get myself in trouble: 

http://www.vulture.com/2012/03/john-carter-doomed-by-first-trailer.html 

Um.  I kind of liked the first trailer, although I was seeing it on a laptop screen and not in a theatre.  It wasn’t totally in my face trying to bully me with how clever it was and how much money it had spent on its special effects—even if how our hero woke up on Mars was a little obscure to me.  Has anyone actually seen this epic-disaster-epic?  I’ve seen three or four reviews, each one breathless to outdo the last in bludgeoning this film-like object into paste.  But then I’m one of these old people who has read Burroughs’ John Carter books and hasn’t seen every science fiction and fantasy movie since STAR WARS.  I might be the deluded director’s target audience.†††  I wanted to like this film.  Didn’t Michael Chabon write the screenplay?!?  The Pulitzer-Prize-winning novelist who takes comics and SF&F seriously?‡  I still do want to like it, although it begins to look like one of those feats painfully accomplished for inclusion in GUINESS WORLD RECORDS:  I ate 1,000,000,000 chocolate chip cookies at one sitting!  I LIKED Andrew Stanton’s John Carter of Mars!

            My problem, from looking at the trailers, however, is that the hero looks like a git.  Sigh.  So I’m not the target audience after all. . . . 

* * *

* Yes.  It and I are running late.  Now shut up and go away.  I’m busy. 

** Note that the Britannica online is pretty negative too . . . and also just wrong.  However.  This is another of those political swamps I stay out of to maintain my fragile mental health. 

*** Which was as far as the tiny advance would reach. 

† Although it was already pretty much in bits when I bought it for $1 at a garage sale twenty years or so ago 

†† But if ‘incredibly’ is going to involve plugs in the back of my neck, I’ll pass. 

††† It is possibly relevant that I hated THOR.  If I stick to the minority opinion, then I have quite a good chance of liking JOHN CARTER. 

‡ And wrote The Yiddish Policeman’s Union, which is better than Kavalier and Clay

 

 

A Visceral Response to International Women’s Day

 

Well, I’m celebrating International Women’s Day by . . . coming down with a stomach virus.  JOY. *  And here I had thought as I sat at choir practise tonight that my disturbing queasiness was merely the result of trying to sing frelling John Rutter’s frelling The Owl and the Pussycat.**

            There is, however, a certain artistic symmetry to the situation.  Is anyone else . . . hmmm . . . unwowed by the concept of an International Women’s Day?  Like women are some kind of special interest fringe group that needs to have a day named after us and dedicated to us to bring us to global attention?  Because no one will notice us and our bizarre, incomprehensible needs and wants otherwise?  What is the matter with this world?  

Corellia

I wonder how many times Clara Schumann thought “I should have listened to my father”.

She didn’t compose anything after the age of 36, but she continued touring and teaching as long as she was able to, and is credited with both changing the repertoire for concert pianists and for developing modern piano technique. Not a bad record for someone who had to be married to a mentally ill man…. 

Her father was still a bullying hysterical control freak, even if it turned out he had a point about Schumann.  Apparently greed came into it as well:  he kept her concert earnings while she still belonged to him.  She was well out of his clutches by pretty much any means.  (I’ve got the standard Clara bio at home on my TBR shelf.  I want to know, among other things, about Clara’s mum, who, understandably, divorced her creep of a husband–but why did she leave her daughter behind?)  What I keep thinking about is that she went from the hands of one smothering madman to another:  very rough karma for a woman with fantastic talent.  (And we’ll omit comment about that total little tick Brahms altogether.)  If Robert (a) hadn’t wrecked his hand and (b) had stayed sane, I wonder how much of a career Clara would have had in any shape or form?  I don’t deny Robert’s fantastic talent—but he got to use his.  Clara had eight kids to raise, and a husband writing sweet endearments in their joint diary about how music was all very well but what he wanted his wife for was to be a wife. 

            I grant the injustice isn’t all in one direction:  it’s very nice and all that the bloke gets to engage with what’s in him to put into service—but he also has to because he’s got his useless wife and all their useless kids to support.  It’s such a stupid system.

            And yes, Clara revolutionised piano playing and had a career as a concert pianist into her 70s.  But perhaps because I’m a producer rather than performer myself, I can’t forget that she ‘lost confidence’ in her composing and, as you say, composed no more after the age of 36.  Have you heard what she wrote as a teenager, for pity’s sake?  Sure, people burn out young sometimes.  But I don’t think that was the problem here.  What-ifs are futile but yes, I mourn for the music that Clara didn’t write. 

             And now, if you’ll forgive me, I think I’ll go lie down. . . . † 

* * *

* And I caught it by email.  Unfair!  It wasn’t even an attachment!  But I missed a set-up-in-advance^ phone call a couple of days ago when I got an email from the friend in question saying that she had stomach flu and we’d have to reschedule. And here I sympathised, having NO IDEA she had coughed on her monitor and touched her keyboard with unsterilized fingers when she wrote to me.  So much for my internet security programme.  

^ Because the five hours’ time difference with east coast America is a ratbag, because my so-called schedule has no grounding in reality, because I never know where I’m going to be even if I think I know what I’m doing, and because I’m not going to hold a long international call on Pooka’s+ speakerphone++ out in the middle of a field.+++  

+ This aside from questions about iPhone battery life, the answers to which are ugly. 

++ Because I don’t care what the dubiously-funded tests say about safety, I am not going to clamp my mobile phone to my skull for long periods of time. 

+++ And no knitting available. 

** One of his Five Childhood Lyrics.  I believe I was complaining about Sing a Song of Sixpence last week.  Sixpence is a doddle compared to O&P.  Because I am a poor sad ailing thing with minimal brain for blog-writing or teeth-brushing and to-bed-going I have just wasted a silly amount of time listening to as many O&Ps on YouTube that I can find . . . with disappointing results.  The soprano-destroyer is the descant over the basses singing . . . Said the piggy ‘I will’. . . . when our line suddenly develops frantic wedding-march-itis for two bars, and then does it again a phrase later.  FRELL. FRELLFRELLFRELLFRELLFRELL.  And Griselda wasn’t there tonight.  It was a bloodbath.  But I can’t find a performance that does it justice—my impression is that this is through a combination of poor miking and the fact that the music is winning and the sopranos are losing.  If you listen very closely you can just about hear soprano-self-immolation^ going on in this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcB9j0ouGvE&feature=related

I will take it to Nadia on Monday.  It has a wholly gratuitous top A, but that’s not the problem.^^  The problem is the tuneRemind me why I wanted to sing in a choir. ^^^

^ Someone on Facebook a few nights ago—whenever I last used the word—said she enjoyed my blog for the vocabulary, and cited ‘immolation’.  Oh dear.  I consider that basic idiom, like hellhound, frelling and ARRRRRRGH. 

^^ At home, most nights, I have a B.  It wasn’t all that long ago that I only had a G at home.  After a glass of champagne.+ 

+ Champagne.  That’s what this stomach needs.  Yes.   

^^^ Because it’s too late to learn the violin, or some other your-body-is-not-your-instrument suitable for playing in groups. 

† But do have a cruise through these, some of which made me laugh out loud.  Which was kind of a mistake.  I merely highlight one that has bearing on the current topic.  http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/03/08/international-womens-day-jokes-funny-women-quotes_n_1330155.html#s760411&title=Jane_Austen

Next Page »