Robin McKinley's Web Site .:. Robin McKinley's Blog

Robin McKinley

Official Web Forum

Home » Discussion Forums » Blog Post Discussion » Shut up, Billy
Shut up, Billy [message #49815] Wed, 16 May 2012 22:01 Go to next message
jmeadows  is currently offline jmeadows
Messages: 3174
Registered: September 2008
Location: Virginia, USA
Senior Member
[Moderator]

Shut up, Billy


Smooshes!
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49816 is a reply to message #49815 ] Wed, 16 May 2012 22:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jmeadows  is currently offline jmeadows
Messages: 3174
Registered: September 2008
Location: Virginia, USA
Senior Member
[Moderator]

Sorry the movie theater was such a pain, but YAY NEW YARN STORE!!!! I cannot wait to see what you got.


Smooshes!
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49821 is a reply to message #49815 ] Thu, 17 May 2012 01:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Diane in MN  is currently offline Diane in MN
Messages: 2755
Registered: October 2008
Location: Twin Cities, MN, USA
Senior Member
Yes, I know you don’t knit from stash. Stash is stash. If you want to knit something you have to go out and buy yarn. But I find that—um—sometimes you do want to knit up some of your yarn. [. . .] Um—does this mean I’m not a real knitter?

Oh, no. Unless you have discovered the secret of the Infinitely Expandable Closet, you have to knit from your stash so you have room for MORE YARN. Very Happy

Fiona fired up her iPhone [ . . . ] and ascertained that the post code on the cinema web site was wrong.

One of the basic laws of data processing is GIGO, or garbage in, garbage out. Given that you ended up at a sewage plant, you obviously encountered this law in its most extreme form.



"The point of books is to have way too many but to always feel you never have enough . . . " Louise Erdrich
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49822 is a reply to message #49815 ] Thu, 17 May 2012 01:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EMoon
Messages: 669
Registered: March 2009
Senior Member
I had KnittingFail today. Some days past, I discovered that a vertical section of the sock cuff in progress was disintegrating. There appeared to be the right number of stitches on the needles, but something was terribly wrong...loops of yarn were sticking out in one place. Could not find any sign of a dropped stitch, just this sudden excess yarn. I carefully ripped back to where the fabric appeared sound and rescued the stitches (this was 2x2 ribbing, so there were two rows of stitches, the knits and the purls, and they weren't willing to be picked up sequentially as they'd been done. So there were many needles plus anything else that would hold one or two or five or seven stitches really quickly...) Left everything alone for a few days while I gathered the courage to look at it again, and then--slowly and carefully--I transferred stitches on the extra (not same size) needles to the ones that belonged there. Counted stitches again. Right number. Arranged on four needles, with the fifth now ready to start knitting again.

Today I started a round of knitting on that cuff again. And the previously sound-appearing bit promptly dissolved into stray loops, one of them slouching over a needle where it had been masquerading as a stitch. It had already been a long day; the voice lesson that started well had gone sour, and I was facing two hours of choir rehearsal...and I'd spent hours on whatever I'd done to that sock cuff. Wasted hours.

So...I ripped it back to yarn, wrapped the yarn around the ball so it would relax in time, and determined to start that sock over from a fresh ball (I had a couple of extra balls of that red yarn.) But all in all...NOT a good day of knitting, even though I'd knit on the cuff of the other sock successfully.


E
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49823 is a reply to message #49815 ] Thu, 17 May 2012 04:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
equus_peduus
Messages: 437
Registered: September 2009
Location: France
Senior Member
Stash acquisition and knitting/crocheting are separate, though marginally related, hobbies. You can certainly knit out of stash... but buying yarn for a specific project, once you decide on the project, may be necessary occasionally (or even most of the time). Talking to the yarn in your stash and finding out what it wants to be, on the other hand, can be a hazardous and dangerous prospect (the yarn for my most recently completed pair of socks was acquired for one pattern, and it said NO. So I let it sulk for a few months, and tried again. This time got as far as most of a sock before it told me it really didn't like what I was doing with it. But I really wanted that sock, so I made those socks in something else while I unwound this yarn, let it think about things, and finally found a pattern it would agree to (it's called Wandering Rose) - and that was a process that took several days of Ravelrying.)

Stash exists to be pretty and be pet. You don't have to knit out of stash, though you may find storage to be a problem after a while.
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49837 is a reply to message #49815 ] Thu, 17 May 2012 16:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Corellia  is currently offline Corellia
Messages: 111
Registered: June 2010
Location: Norway
Senior Member
Speaking as an underemployed and underpaid person, stash exists to be knit from. I mostly buy my yarn with a project in mind too, although I (or the yarn) may change my mind before I get to the Finished Object.
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49856 is a reply to message #49815 ] Fri, 18 May 2012 15:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PamAdams  is currently offline PamAdams
Messages: 254
Registered: May 2010
Senior Member
one other First Cardigan

There's Third Damar Novel and Third House, clearly you can have multiple First Cardigans.

[still resisting knitting........]
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49891 is a reply to message #49815 ] Sun, 20 May 2012 05:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
equus_peduus
Messages: 437
Registered: September 2009
Location: France
Senior Member
Finally got to watching that Gigspanner video...

Quote:

before Roger started beating up Peter’s fiddle


There's actually a legitimate string playing technique called col legno in which one hits the strings with the stick of the bow rather than drawing the hair of the bow across the string. Not necessarily terribly good for the wood of the bow (I probably wouldn't want to do much of it with my new(ish) nice bow), but it creates an interesting sound. So as long as Roger wasn't beating very hard, it is just an extension of that Smile I thought it was a fun video.
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49939 is a reply to message #49891 ] Mon, 21 May 2012 23:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
blondviolinist  is currently offline blondviolinist
Messages: 1076
Registered: October 2008
Location: Midwestern United States
Senior Member
equus_peduus wrote on Sun, 20 May 2012 05:49

Finally got to watching that Gigspanner video...

Quote:

before Roger started beating up Peter’s fiddle


There's actually a legitimate string playing technique called col legno in which one hits the strings with the stick of the bow rather than drawing the hair of the bow across the string. Not necessarily terribly good for the wood of the bow (I probably wouldn't want to do much of it with my new(ish) nice bow), but it creates an interesting sound. So as long as Roger wasn't beating very hard, it is just an extension of that Smile I thought it was a fun video.


Heh. I was under the impression that col legno is worse on the strings than the bow. And the strings are going to be replaced regularly anyway.

The "beating up the fiddle" clip was fun! It looked like he was only beating on the fingerboard, which is made of tough ebony, so I'm sure it wasn't actually hurting the instrument. (Well, again, the strings might need changing a bit sooner than otherwise.)


"Purity of heart is to will one thing." Kirkegaard
Re: Shut up, Billy [message #49941 is a reply to message #49939 ] Tue, 22 May 2012 04:20 Go to previous message
equus_peduus
Messages: 437
Registered: September 2009
Location: France
Senior Member
blondviolinist wrote on Mon, 21 May 2012 20:12



Heh. I was under the impression that col legno is worse on the strings than the bow. And the strings are going to be replaced regularly anyway.


I had always been told it's bad for your bow. It being bad for the strings only make sense, but as you said, they're going to get replaced, so maybe that's why nobody told me about that part? Dunno. I wonder if this is an area of no-particular-agreement-among-musicians?
Previous Topic:Forum Knitting
Next Topic:Whinge Snarl Cavil
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jun 18 02:06:34 EDT 2013

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10184 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum.
Copyright © FUD Forum Bulletin Board Software